Purpose: Session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE) is an often-used measure to assess athletes’ training load (TL). However, little is known about which factors could optimize the quality of data collection thereof. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of the survey methods and the time points when sRPE was assessed on the correlation between subjective (sRPE) and objective (heart-rate training impulse; TRIMP) assessment of TL. Methods: In the first part of the study, 45 well-trained subjects (30 men and 15 women) performed 20 running sessions with a heart-rate monitor and reported sRPE 30 min after training cessation. For the reporting, the subjects were grouped into 3 groups (paper–pencil, online questionnaire, and mobiledevice). In the second part of the study, another 40 athletes (28 men and 12 women) performed 4 × 5 running sessions with the 4 time points to report the sRPE randomly assigned (directly after training cessation, 30 min postexercise, in the evening of the same day, and the next morning directly after waking up). Results: The assessment of sRPE is influenced by time point, survey method, TRIMP, sex, and training type. It is recommended to assess sRPE values via a mobile device or online tool, as the paper survey method displayed lower correlations between sRPE and TRIMP. Conclusions: Subjective TL measures are highly individual. When compared with the same relative intensity, lower sRPE values were reported by women for the training types representing slow runs and for time points with greater duration between training cessation and sRPE assessment. The assessment method for sRPE should be kept constant for each athlete, and comparisons between athletes or sexes are not recommended.
Wirkmodelle werden im Kontext theoriebasierter Evaluationsansätze ein immer häufiger verwendetes Instrument. Viele Fragen in Bezug auf das angemessene Vorgehen bei der Entwicklung und Verwendung von Wirkmodellen bleiben allerdings oft unbeantwortet, nicht zuletzt, da konkrete Fallbeispiele selten genau genug dokumentiert werden. Nach einem kurzen Überblick zur Rolle von Wirkmodellen in der aktuellen Evaluationsliteratur beschreibt der Beitrag am Beispiel des schweizerischen Programms ‚Jugend und Sport‘ ausführlich die Entwicklung eines Wirkmodells, die gleichzeitig literaturbasiert und unter Einbeziehung wichtiger Stakeholdergruppen erfolgte. Erfahrungen werden aus den Perspektiven Auftraggebende, Modellentwicklung und Evaluationstheorie reflektiert. Dabei werden drei häufig genannte Herausforderungen thematisiert: Machen Wirkmodelle blind für nicht intendierte Wirkungen? Sollten Wirkmodelle die Sichtweise von Stakeholdern abbilden oder sich an etablierten wissenschaftlichen Theorien orientieren? Ist der Aufwand für die Entwicklung eines Wirkmodells gerechtfertigt?
Abstract BACKGROUND: Good physical fitness seems to help the individual to buffer the potential harmful impact of psychosocial stress on somatic and mental health. The aim of the present study is to investigate the role of physical fitness levels on the autonomic nervous system (ANS; i.e. heart rate and salivary alpha amylase) responses to acute psychosocial stress, while controlling for established factors influencing individual stress reactions. METHODS: The Trier Social Stress Test for Groups (TSST-G) was executed with 302 male recruits during their first week of Swiss Army basic training. Heart rate was measured continuously, and salivary alpha amylase was measured twice, before and after the stress intervention. In the same week, all volunteers participated in a physical fitness test and they responded to questionnaires on lifestyle factors and personal traits. A multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to determine ANS responses to acute psychosocial stress from physical fitness test performances, controlling for personal traits, behavioural factors, and socioeconomic data. RESULTS: Multiple linear regression revealed three variables predicting 15 % of the variance in heart rate response (area under the individual heart rate response curve during TSST-G) and four variables predicting 12 % of the variance in salivary alpha amylase response (salivary alpha amylase level immediately after the TSST-G) to acute psychosocial stress. A strong performance at the progressive endurance run (high maximal oxygen consumption) was a significant predictor of ANS response in both models: low area under the heart rate response curve during TSST-G as well as low salivary alpha amylase level after TSST-G. Further, high muscle power, non-smoking, high extraversion, and low agreeableness were predictors of a favourable ANS response in either one of the two dependent variables. CONCLUSIONS: Good physical fitness, especially good aerobic endurance capacity, is an important protective factor against health-threatening reactions to acute psychosocial stress.
